(no subject)
May. 31st, 2011 11:33 amI had written a "Motion for Summary Judgment" which laid out the law, stated facts in a numbered list with each referencing a piece of evidence, and then explained point by point why this clown didn't even deserve a day in court. In response, the Complainant did nothing until the Judge told him to respond. He responded in a rambling narrative of 2-3 pages without a single paragraph break - and frankly without many breaks in sentences which covered 5-6 lines. On the way from the office to B'more, I read an excerpt to Janna along these lines:
"The Agency's Summary Judgment Should be rendered mute..."
"Mute?" Janna queried. "Rendered mute? What on ear...oh my god, he means moot!"
You might like it were the Agency's Representative rendered mute.
"Well, yeah!"
I'll respond to the Judge: "Agency's Counsel's significant other wishes to endorse the motion should it be interpreted as rendering the Agency's Representative mute."
"The Agency's Summary Judgment Should be rendered mute..."
"Mute?" Janna queried. "Rendered mute? What on ear...oh my god, he means moot!"
You might like it were the Agency's Representative rendered mute.
"Well, yeah!"
I'll respond to the Judge: "Agency's Counsel's significant other wishes to endorse the motion should it be interpreted as rendering the Agency's Representative mute."
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:21 pm (UTC)This is a "pro se" litigant, or a guy suing us with no lawyer.
It's actually not that unfair because the law is so clear and simple - his idiocy is not really in his poor writing skill but in the fact he can't get his mind around the idea that when you say you are a victim of discrimination, you have to have some proof of that. For instance, he says he is better qualified than the person who got the job, though they have similar education and experience levels - and her application was inarguably better as, predictably, his was fully of grammatical and typographical errors.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-03 12:54 am (UTC)