(no subject)
Nov. 25th, 2009 05:46 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
NY's Sarah tuned me into this DC CP gem, and if you don't read "The sexist" each week you really should:
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/23/the-christian-side-hug-front-hugs-be-too-sinful/
Christian side-hug to avoid improper touching.
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/23/the-christian-side-hug-front-hugs-be-too-sinful/
Christian side-hug to avoid improper touching.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-25 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-25 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-25 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-25 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-25 04:54 pm (UTC)Getting the crowd pumped with police sirens and gunshots: AAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW SHI-I MEAN, YEAH!
no subject
Date: 2009-11-25 05:15 pm (UTC)Same sex crotch touching is not.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-25 05:39 pm (UTC)I might post this alone later
Date: 2009-11-25 05:43 pm (UTC)1. Churchy people should help the health of others, particularly the poor (to include food and medical care)
2. Churchy people should fight abortions
Now what's funny is the catholic church is fighting the abortion issue by removing support from health care if it provides it, fighting and ostracizing polititians who support it, and cutting services to the poor if they're required to either not-discriminate against gays or not-fight abortions.
So it's ok to throw out feeding and giving healthcare to the poor with the bathwater of abortion? The same source of their obligation to fight against something is the source of their obligation to do something - how they separate the two is beyond my current logic.
Re: I might post this alone later
Date: 2009-11-25 05:59 pm (UTC)