(no subject)

[vicarz]

I have reviewed (in part). We need to discuss these substantive changes. [circled] We can do that after our 2:30 mtg today, weds (pm) or Thurs. morning (w/ our 7:30 AM Appt)

The first 9 pages of my 30 page draft, which is due 5/29 (the aforementioned Thur), were attached marked out more than left alone. Most of the substantive changes noted were rewording happy for glad, though she did attack pretty much everything I did. I actually took her input on another brief and incorporated it, with her comments regarding the litigation of this case, into this piece. Even I am surprised at how she tore this up, more so because she really did reword what I wrote without changing the meaning for the most part. It seems I have a problem.

Response to settlement proposal:
Have talked to parties involved and your offer is rejected.

Had better days, but it was a good weekend and I was ready for this. However, soon my cup o' fuckyou will runneth over.

Comments

[eac.livejournal.com]

Blech.

It may be that she doesn't understand the difference between phrasing and substantive changes. Because people are dumb. Or she may be horrible. Or both.

[vicar.livejournal.com]

She's an experienced attorney, that is to say, she's just being a bitch and there is no question it's on purpose. I'm not the only one with issues with her, but I have the most work with her. If this lasts for many more months I'll be back to job searching.