(no subject)
May. 27th, 2008 01:39 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have reviewed (in part). We need to discuss these substantive changes. [circled] We can do that after our 2:30 mtg today, weds (pm) or Thurs. morning (w/ our 7:30 AM Appt)
The first 9 pages of my 30 page draft, which is due 5/29 (the aforementioned Thur), were attached marked out more than left alone. Most of the substantive changes noted were rewording happy for glad, though she did attack pretty much everything I did. I actually took her input on another brief and incorporated it, with her comments regarding the litigation of this case, into this piece. Even I am surprised at how she tore this up, more so because she really did reword what I wrote without changing the meaning for the most part. It seems I have a problem.
Response to settlement proposal:
Have talked to parties involved and your offer is rejected.
Had better days, but it was a good weekend and I was ready for this. However, soon my cup o' fuckyou will runneth over.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 05:54 pm (UTC)is what it sounds like she was angling to say.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 06:34 pm (UTC)It may be that she doesn't understand the difference between phrasing and substantive changes. Because people are dumb. Or she may be horrible. Or both.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 09:12 pm (UTC)Astronauts get played
tough like a ukelele. Advise.
then take lunch because fuck all.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 12:32 am (UTC):D
no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 01:31 am (UTC)