vicarz: (Vampire (new))
[personal profile] vicarz
So I have this routine I do with court reporters, where I ask if they can please use an oath to which the person responding can just say "yes" without identifying themselves as picking one or the other. I did this on this past deposition.
Why?
Some religions, and some sects of xtianity, don't swear. The concept is they a) don't lie as a part of their required practice, so to swear is an implicit statement that at other times they lie, b) don't swear because it's an insult to pull god into it, or c) I dunno, religion is weird.
Affirm: Many oath givers ask people if they prefer to affirm - making them "out themselves" as some sort of not-swearing freak. Many don't want to identify themselves as using an "affirm," because this sets them apart as someone not of the mainstream religion or sect of the mainstream religion, or as someone who wants to commit to tell the truth but doesn't believe in god - making them honest, but "swear to god" or "on the bible" as moot. Problem there is people don't trust people with no religion at all, distrust people of other religions, and often misinterpret the hyper-technical affirm as dishonest and discount anything they say.

In real court, it sucks to be in the moral predicament. People want their testimony to count, so many "swear" who normally wouldn't swear just to avoid the jury rejecting their truthful testimony.
SO I tell all my court reporters to please do any oath, but in such a way that the response doesn't point out if the person swears or affirms.

My reporter agreed, as they all do, and recited the following:
"Do you swear or affirm, that the testimony you are about to give, is the whole and complete truth, under of penalty of perjury, so help you god?"

Janna got a kid robot plushie donut, and it just so happened it fits perfectly over the speedometer!

Date: 2010-12-20 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jukebox-heroine.livejournal.com
i've only sat on a jury once, and it was about 17 years ago, so i don't remember the way it goes exactly...but is the reporter supposed to say 'so help you god' in a normal setting?
if so, it probably just rolled off by habit?

Date: 2010-12-20 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vicar.livejournal.com
They should not say "so help you god" because to a lot of belief systems that is inappropriate, so it forces the witness/victim to cast doubt in the eyes of an ignorant viewer of the process if they decline to acquiesce.

It's normal, more in the country or red states.
It's normal like all white schools were?

Date: 2010-12-20 07:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jukebox-heroine.livejournal.com
no, i get what you are saying about the person testifying. i'm saying, if it's something that the person says by rote every day, they might have just rattled it off because it's part of the rhetoric.
i mean, when i swore in to my job, i said so help me god without even stopping.

Date: 2010-12-20 09:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vicar.livejournal.com
Oh absolutely I think that's what happened, yup. The problem is they get paid to do better than this. Here, we just had a conversation on the subject and she goes right back to god. Error maybe, rote is highly possible, or it may have been that "fight back for xist in xmas!" attitude.

Regardless of the reason, it was hilarious and I nearly snarfed.

Date: 2010-12-21 12:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jukebox-heroine.livejournal.com
you're better than me. i would have laughed so bad it would have to be put on the record.

Profile

vicarz: (Default)
vicarz

May 2018

S M T W T F S
   1234 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 31st, 2026 09:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios