(no subject)
Feb. 3rd, 2004 09:51 pmKangal explains how to stop trolls: get goth girls to fuck geeks!
http://www.livejournal.com/users/djkangal/266058.html
Criticism of the critic - trolling the trolls? As of when I looked, people that despite the link saying SATIRE didn't get the joke. I don't mean didn't think it was funny, I mean just didn't get it.
So a guy was shot in Ballou HS in SE DC. So friggin what. Why so callous over the loss of human life? Why am I not sympathetic for this youth who they repeatedly note was successful on the football team?
"The incident apparently stemmed from a feud between two groups of students who are based in different neighborhoods
Translation - he was in a gang and got shot. So he played football, did he carry a gun? How was he doing in real school when he wasn't playing games or involved in gang wars? Is this a loss? It sucks for the kids who aren't there involved in gang wars, but this guy doesn't seem like a loss at a quick glance.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A5463-2004Feb2.html (turn on pop-up blocker for the Wash Post)
http://www.livejournal.com/users/djkangal/266058.html
Criticism of the critic - trolling the trolls? As of when I looked, people that despite the link saying SATIRE didn't get the joke. I don't mean didn't think it was funny, I mean just didn't get it.
So a guy was shot in Ballou HS in SE DC. So friggin what. Why so callous over the loss of human life? Why am I not sympathetic for this youth who they repeatedly note was successful on the football team?
"The incident apparently stemmed from a feud between two groups of students who are based in different neighborhoods
Translation - he was in a gang and got shot. So he played football, did he carry a gun? How was he doing in real school when he wasn't playing games or involved in gang wars? Is this a loss? It sucks for the kids who aren't there involved in gang wars, but this guy doesn't seem like a loss at a quick glance.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A5463-2004Feb2.html (turn on pop-up blocker for the Wash Post)
no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 11:09 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 04:01 am (UTC)Kangal's "get a goth chick to fuck a geek" just wasn't funny.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 06:08 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 06:16 am (UTC)I don't mind living in a shitty neighborhood so much as I mind not knowing if my safety and property are in jeapordy, and it seems they feel the same way. Thugs like these are why it sucks to be poor! There is no good reason that choosing to live inexpensively, through choice or just not having other options, should mean that you life is in constant jeapardy.
I'm not saying we should turn away from the problem, but what is the problem? Which people? What do you do? They already have the highly invasive searches, scanners, metal detectors, and full-time police pressence in place.
The new Bush budget is cutting funding to both recreational and education programs aimed at troubled inner-city areas (and the disabled).
Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 06:30 am (UTC)Many feel let down by the government - large parts of SE are ignored by the government, or policed like a warzone when agencies do take an interest in them.
They absolutely do care about the violence in their own neighbourhoods. The solution to that problem isn't to slowly patrol the streets arbitrarily questioning young men. I've faced that kind of behaviour *once*, when I was skulking through my relatively affluent violent crime-free suburban neighbourhood late at night. I've witnessed that behaviour directed toward a good friend on several occasions, including at 5:30 PM outside my former office building on K St.
The solution involves a whole hell of a lot of work from many sides, but something that seems to be lacking horribly is parenting. Too many of these kids' parents, as you yourself stated, are forced to work multiple minimum-wage jobs just to make ends meet. That leaves the kids to fend for and learn for themselves. That's generally not a good situation. I've been watching that same sort of issue develop in a very affluent suburban family, as well - the parents aren't around in useful ways, and the kids are beginning to act out in pretty damaging ways.
Cutting funding for social programs... That probably won't help this situation too much.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 06:20 am (UTC)Vicar, quit being a trolling putz. You have insightful thoughts on the matter - I've seen 'em. I'll post 'em if I have to ;)
Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 06:49 am (UTC)I have some thoughts on the matter, but don't have any answers. The problems are large and systemic. It's sad that we have the funds to send machines oversease to ensure we get more fuel for machines, but don't allocate funding for schools in these areas. I don't think we can ever waste money in schools, recreational programs, outreach, etc.
At the same time, how do you remove the crime while preserving people's rights?
Next week - addressing why you can't raise a family on one income anymore: too much SUV/HDTV drive or inability to afford basic necessities?
Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 07:05 am (UTC)That's a big part of it. Unfortunately, I don't know that you do. Money, time, and effort have to be injected into the situation all over the country, with no hope for an immediate "fix" - the systemic problem's been developing (or been around, depending on your perspective) for years/decades/far longer than can be repaired overnight. Unfortunately, if the larger society doesn't see an immediate turn-around in the situation, funding and support goes away and things continue as more and more people's lives are destroyed.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 04:21 am (UTC)It's horrible for the people that are there that are not fight-starting rival-shooting gang members. For the gang members, the more we don't have to live with the better. Perhaps he was a wonderful person, but I haven't heard anything to lead me to believe that.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-04 06:26 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 06:45 am (UTC)What should really happen is that I fuck them! That way, they're just plain confused!
Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 06:49 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 06:56 am (UTC)Now pardon me, I must go troll so I can get some hot goth chics...
Re:
Date: 2004-02-08 10:07 am (UTC)-- A
Apathy
Date: 2004-02-04 05:53 pm (UTC)m