(no subject)
Jun. 1st, 2007 06:08 amSo I'm doing a post of the type I mock...passive aggressive indirect attacks!
LJ will notify you when someone adds you as a friend (hooray) but not when someone leaves your LJ (boo). I checked my list lately and found some of the more annoying people on my f-list left mine - hooray! I decided to remove a few people - that I don't know well, whose posts I find annoying or dull (yet frequent) and ditched them. No worries - they don't actually read my LJ, so they won't be offended by this post. I think they just collect names to feel like they have an audience. Another LJ boo - you can't get people to stop being listed as your friend, even when they delete their own LJ entirely. I'm anal (see icon) and wish my list to show symmetry...
LJ did their ban the pedo war...huh. I'm tired of anyone, even a nut-job, being able to have a massive effect on people by yelling "pedo" and having everyone go nuts to cover their ass. This is a typical american problem - LJ isn't important, but the same problem pervades real politics over real issues in this country. Anyone can accuse anyone of being a pedo, terrorist, or drug dealer, and it results in frozen bank accounts (preventing you from getting an attorney), tapped phones, ruined reputations, police seizures (oh, say of the computer that could show the lack of pedo), and all sorts of inconvenience. If you lose your job over charges you prove untrue, you have no recourse. So anyone can call you a pedo, terrorist, drug dealer, or feared-flavor-of-the-week and you're fawked with no recourse. The accuser is immune from prosecution.
So the nut who started the whole LJ pedo thing...dominion xtian, or just another internet troll? Trolls love this sort of controversey - it's entirely possible the whole thing was just another troll flame war, for which they could be beaming with pride now.
I was scolded over coffee lately that LJ is so old (like me) and everyone is using myspace or facebook - duh! I may check out facebook to see if it is less-dumb than myspace, which I lack interest in.
LAW CARP - Day 2 didn't wear me down as much, but I need to buckle down and get more work done. I have to prep a lot of work in advance of the class - my hours are going to be tight until my leave starts. MY GRADES ARE STILL NOT POSTED, INCLUDING THE PASS/FAIL CLASS. GMU-law sucks in terms of consideration of the students as I don't know of another school that hasn't posted grades yet, and they are vital for law geeks. Yes I said carp.
EDIT Oh fuck...that bunghole who caused the whole TB scare wasn't some dumb redneck; he's a 31 year old lawyer. Great, like the profession didn't look bad enough in the eyes of the public already. Of corse he's a PI lawyer. He claims he wasn't told not to travel, and has tapes to prove it. Here's a lawyerly analysis - why would he tape conversations in advance to prove a lack of notification? A - because he knew better. Now I support his personal death penalty.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 10:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 11:16 am (UTC)so THAT'S what that damn thing is!
Hooray for knowing!
Boo for being anal
Hooray for anal
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 11:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 11:32 am (UTC)Facebook: initially this was a college-age social networking/hook-up system. Again, as a current student I created a profile. It seems very, very popular (was) among underclassmen and for some degree international students. again--same problem--you have to aggressively rebuild a network and read/comment/post to others.
tribes: I was pushed into this one in order to ferret out the local Michigan scenes. It seems that it would have been more usable on the west cost; pretty wasted for MI or DC that I can see.
End of the day...I figure it is a matter or time before people are using their own PCs as their main webserver and RSS-feeding their blog entries to a range of these networks that have been aggregated within one browser app that maintains a tab for each site. Even then, other than the hyper-social or those who are under-utilized in their jobs and have more time to post, the majority won't truly utilize them at full capacity.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 11:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 12:38 pm (UTC)I agree with you on the BOLD comments. It is amazing that what people don't realize is that you dont have to worry about the idiots that they have identified, you have to worry about the ones that are still out there. I was reading this book on McCarthyism and some similarities of the onslaught of the period seem to be reforming...
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 01:14 pm (UTC)These new kids and their new acronyms! Who the fuck knows? I only recently learned "ROFLMAO" supplants "LOL" because my friend bought a Blackberry and she has the time and temperament to identify new acronyms and type the fuckers out.
Is there some sort of list for internet acronyms when people don't spell out sentences?
XOXO! I love your posts! GUSH!!!! Be old! Be a true journaler!!!
also, my dial-up can't download pics so heavy multimedia content just pisses me off.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 01:17 pm (UTC)While I disagree with the response to pressure and recent LJ decisions it remains my primary means of staying in touch with a diverse group of contacts and friends. To do more I'd need to be a best selling author with my own website and blog...which would lose the entire "accidental community" aspect.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 01:23 pm (UTC)Hell, it knocks out most of LJ.
Thank you! I don't find your posts boring...though they make me want to hang out with you, fud up, a drink or two, and ask you "Huh?" :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 01:39 pm (UTC)I'm a very confusing writer online. I'm convinced the only reason people read my entries is out of morbid curiosity. Which is why I've trimmed my friendslist as well. Fuck those voyeurs. Why aren't they posting pics of half-nekkid people at hippy parties?
Quizzes are annoying.
What does NSFW mean????
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 01:47 pm (UTC)NSFW - not safe for work, ie naked or nearly naked sexual pictures, the kind of thing that many of us could be fired for if they unexpectedly found it on their screen while their boss unexpectedly walked up in front of the monitor (or the security guys archive it and produce it as evidence later of inappropriate computer use)
The Huh isn't a lack of comprehension of your writing, it's more the thought process...cast of characters, for instance. You think someone is gone and *poof* there they are again! You're mad, no you're not, what about that thing, never mind that thing...
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 02:06 pm (UTC)To put it mildly, I'm kept on a short leash. If I weren't, I'd wander off or I'd go back to Priors.
And it's any wonder that my stories aren't fully resolved??? LOL. I've had to learn how to resolve situations versus characters.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 02:40 pm (UTC)--kelowna
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 02:46 pm (UTC)Question! If someone falsely accuses you of something yucky, isn't that slander/libel? Or would that not apply because the accuser is purportedly acting in the public interest? I'm ignorant. Teach me!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 03:24 pm (UTC)However, I think that if someone falsely accuses you, it depends on how falsely. If you had anime fashion, and you were identified as a pedo because you had pictures of "children" in your archive - it's probably close enough to reality to get away with it. Or, if you are accused of being a drug trafficer / terrorist (now they're one and the same, thank you W) because people visit your house at night, well they didn't know you weren't dealing drugs - those creeps looked scary and you never go to church! You can stretch almost any facts to allow people to report on one another - we love people who snitch on their neighbors, like like the Germans in WW2.
If they caught saying "I'm going to falsely accuse X of dealing drugs to taint his reputation," you might have a case.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 06:18 pm (UTC)Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know. :) I wasn't trying to question your logic, I just wanted to learn more. So, if I understand you, basically it would be slander if the accusation were false, if the accuser knew it was false, and if the accuser was talking shit about you in order to damage your rep? Close?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 06:16 pm (UTC)Also I'm vain and enjoy putting tons of pictures of myself up. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 06:25 pm (UTC)