Date: 2007-05-11 01:49 pm (UTC)
I think that's high - but not different than what I've heard from many others. I also recently visited our career center to double check my facts against their recruitment experience/knowledge, and it came out the same. The thing they did was suggest people work more in small firms than is obvious.

http://www.internetbar.org/Article20.html (1st p)

In 2000, " The ABA Career Satisfaction Survey (2000) showed 46.8 % of associates at large firms nationally work more than 60 hours per week,"
http://www.pardc.org/Publications/lf_interim_report.shtml

The firm will award bonuses only to associates who billed 2,000 hours or more. All associates who billed less than 2,000 hours will receive only a $10,000 bonus. “The firm will continue its practice of paying an additional bonus to those associates . . . who have worked hours significantly exceeding target.” An additional bonus of $10,000 will be paid to associates who billed at least 2,300 hours, and another $10,000 bonus will go to associates who billed at least 2,500 hours.
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2006/12/20/should-law-firms-tie-bonuses-to-hours-billed/

This one was fun - caught billing 3200 hours a year
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2006/11/10/3200-hours-a-year-you-gotta-be-kidding-me/

I'm not saying I wouldn't work in a firm, just that right now - until I find data or an offer that shows something significantly different - I'm better off in gummint.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

vicarz: (Default)
vicarz

May 2018

S M T W T F S
   1234 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 4th, 2025 01:51 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios