I love how the official statements on this are going:
It was a military target, there was no wedding celebration.
No women or children were killed.
Well o.k., maybe a few women but no children.
Bad people have parties too.
Is it impossible for these people to state the simple truth? Can't they just come out and say it was a legitimate target and unfortunately surveillance failed notice the sizable number of civilians in the area having a party. Or how about just “oops"
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
It was not a wedding celebration
Date: 2004-05-24 10:49 am (UTC)It was a military target, there was no wedding celebration.
No women or children were killed.
Well o.k., maybe a few women but no children.
Bad people have parties too.
Is it impossible for these people to state the simple truth? Can't they just come out and say it was a legitimate target and unfortunately surveillance failed notice the sizable number of civilians in the area having a party. Or how about just “oops"
no subject
Date: 2004-05-24 11:20 am (UTC)*rimshot*
(no subject)
From: