![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Sex is legal in Canada
Oct. 28th, 2007 10:01 pmI've always said that there is nothing magic about one place vs. another, that essentially people are all the same and while the clothes and minor differences in mannerisms may vary that ultimately people are people and it's foolish to dream that things are better or worse in a different locale. There may be differences in terms of geography, such as rural vs. urban, but that's it. I respected Kel, but she always said things were different in Toronto, and I never believed her.
( I've never been to Toronto. )
This is long. I'm tired. No one will read this whole thing anyway, nor should they as I've missed 4 days of LJ and have no plans to catch up. So I'll wrap up here for now, except to say this:
WHEREFORE the party of the USian part, being José, had previously disagreed with Kelowna, hereinafter referred to as the party of the Northern part, HEREBY ADMITS that the party of the Northern part was correct in their proclamations as they pertained to the culture, presence thereof, numerousness, diversity and depth, and concurrent appearance of the existence of appreciation of art and expression for the pure delight thereof, to be starkly contrasted to the visual display thereof for society status and rank. FURTHERMORE, the party of the USian orientation concedes that the evidence supporting his contentions, made in good faith, that cultures vary little from locales with similar geographical structure, has been found somewhat lacking and stands in apparent opposition to the reality found in the geographic locale centralized around the party of the Northern part. Kel was right, I was wrong.
Edited to add - oh, it bears a serious mention that Kel was a phenomenal host. Much luvs to the North, it was and is very appreciated. I can't thank you enough, but I will try.
( I've never been to Toronto. )
This is long. I'm tired. No one will read this whole thing anyway, nor should they as I've missed 4 days of LJ and have no plans to catch up. So I'll wrap up here for now, except to say this:
WHEREFORE the party of the USian part, being José, had previously disagreed with Kelowna, hereinafter referred to as the party of the Northern part, HEREBY ADMITS that the party of the Northern part was correct in their proclamations as they pertained to the culture, presence thereof, numerousness, diversity and depth, and concurrent appearance of the existence of appreciation of art and expression for the pure delight thereof, to be starkly contrasted to the visual display thereof for society status and rank. FURTHERMORE, the party of the USian orientation concedes that the evidence supporting his contentions, made in good faith, that cultures vary little from locales with similar geographical structure, has been found somewhat lacking and stands in apparent opposition to the reality found in the geographic locale centralized around the party of the Northern part. Kel was right, I was wrong.
Edited to add - oh, it bears a serious mention that Kel was a phenomenal host. Much luvs to the North, it was and is very appreciated. I can't thank you enough, but I will try.
