(no subject)
Aug. 30th, 2004 08:19 amI love living in Washington just to see the Post (allegedly left-wing, a point I'd argue against) and the Times side by side. Today, the post, like much of the news on television, is starting with the headlines regarding the 200k+ protesters in NYC against the republican convention. The times, on the other hand, has the headline along the lines of "Cheney compliments Bush's leadership since 9/11." Biased reporting is one thing, I mean but at what point do they just ignore what is conceivably defined as news? 200k in the streets to protest the administration, or a predictable campaign speech in a convention? I would understand "200k reject Bush" liberal vs. "dirty unemployed gay hippies whine about good Bush leadership" conservative as being different ways of presenting the same facts, but totally ignoring news is bizarre. FOX is everywhere!
It's reasons like that I'm more comfortable with the left than the right.
( Smart? Learn how to communicate. )
I know I did good in the gym this weekend because I'm sore as all hell.
It's reasons like that I'm more comfortable with the left than the right.
( Smart? Learn how to communicate. )
I know I did good in the gym this weekend because I'm sore as all hell.