Date: 2004-03-15 07:06 am (UTC)
There has to be a distinction between civilian and military targets?

It seems to me that the perspective of heads of State is thus: If the press finds out its good to have an answer ready. The rest of the time? Who cares? An overwhelming show of force will get the point across.


Terrorism must succeeed somehow, or it would die out.

I don't think that assessment is wrong. Though I think that terrorism is born more out of desperation, poverty, hopelessness, frustration and ignorance than anything else.

Please understand that I don't pretend to be an expert or even very educated about the matter. A large part of me agrees with what either you or [livejournal.com profile] _blackjack wrote earlier in that societies that are more prosperous tend to be more free. My cynicism takes it to the next step in saying that, in modern times, terrorists are the stupid dopes who have their ideologies used against them by their leadership for their leadership's own ends.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

vicarz: (Default)
vicarz

May 2018

S M T W T F S
   1234 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 30th, 2025 05:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios