Re: What about...

Date: 2004-02-12 11:16 am (UTC)
"3 or more women was probably more brothel related."

Definitely. However, couldn't one also argue that legislation prohibiting gays from marrying is more morality related than a discrimination issue?

The above is definitely NOT my view on the subject, just making a point on just how flexible definitions can be.

In both cases, public morality is used as an alter-ego for discrimination.

As long as marriage exists, then I'm for gay marriage, but in point of fact, I don't think ANY MARRIAGE should be recognized by the government at all -- it's a vestige of the last century, when you had a division of labor where one stayed home and the other worked. The world has changed tremendously since then.

Marriage should be a religious institution only, in the same way as being born-again or confirmed or going through a bar mitzvah (i.e. you get nuttin from the gubmint just cuz you were born again). Everyone should have to file individual taxes, etc. regardless of whether you have a ring on your finger or not.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

vicarz: (Default)
vicarz

May 2018

S M T W T F S
   1234 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 12:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios