ext_133297 ([identity profile] vicar.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] vicarz 2008-01-26 01:10 pm (UTC)

Check this out:
http://www.livescience.com/health/070130_bad_drycleaning.html
Clearly angry, but the answer seems to be "not good, but not as bad, but sure as hell not organic like you would think." They mention that most are using petro-chemicals, but at the bottom give a brief mention about non-chemically stuff like C02.

That brings us here:
http://www.organicconsumers.org/organic/dryclean100603.cfm (co2 good)

I guess we have to find out what each means by organic.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting