http://users.livejournal.com/_blackjack_/ (
http://users.livejournal.com/_blackjack_/
) wrote
in
vicarz
2005-11-16 07:50 pm (UTC)
Re: Chemical weapons?
The real distinction is that, whatever secondary effects DU munitions may have, we aren't inflicting them intentionally. We aren't using the toxicity as a weapon.
This WP thing, however, is a pretty blatantly intentional "repurposing" as a weapon.
(
18 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
Re: Chemical weapons?
This WP thing, however, is a pretty blatantly intentional "repurposing" as a weapon.