i didn't read savage's point that way. i don't know which specific column it was anymore but i am pretty sure what he was trying to get at was that monogamy is not for everyone (but if it works for you that's totally fine), and the 'natural' examples were just a few to shoot down the 'fundy christian sex in marriage is the only thing that's valid it's natures way' argument. i don't think it was meant to be applied to our entire lives, just to refute something else.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2009-07-23 07:52 pm (UTC)